US Judge Guilford Refuses to Opine on Fraud in the US Courts

Judge Andrew Guilford, US Court, Central District of California, refuses to opine on fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts
____
"Any 'well-qualified' judge, who works with the systems on a daily basis, must be aware of the fraud perpetrated on the People through PACER and CM/ECF." Regardless, there is no evidence that any US judge has initiated corrective actions.
____

Judge Andrew Guilford
____
Los Angeles, June 22 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), released correspondence with US Judge Andrew Guilford, pertaining to fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts, PACER and CM/ECF. Dr Zernik provided Judge Guilford with ample evidence of fraud in the systems and repeatedly requested Judge Guilford's opinion on the matter.

Judge Guilford refused to opine on the matter.
Dr Zernik also requested that Judge Guilford (and likewise, all other judges who received the notice) consider the communications as a notice of "unprofessional conduct" in the US courts, and initiate corrective actions. The Code of Conduct of US Judges says that judges should initiate corrective actions upon being credibly informed of such conduct.

PACER and CM/ECF were installed about a decade ago. Large-scale fraud in the systems was opined, peer-reviewed, and published in a scholarly computer science journals. However, there is no evidence that any US judge has ever initiated any actions to correct the situation.

"Any 'well-qualified' judge, who works with the systems on a daily basis, must be aware of the fraud perpetrated on the People through PACER and CM/ECF," says Dr Zernik.
____

ANDREW J. GUILFORD
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Andrew J. Guilford (born 1950) is a United States federal judge.

Born in Santa Monica, California, Guilford received an A.B. from the University of California, Los Angeles in 1972 and a J.D. from the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law in 1975. He was in private practice in Costa Mesa, California from 1975 to 2006.

On January 25, 2006, Guilford was nominated by President George W. Bush to a seat on the United States District Court for the Central District of California vacated by Dickran M. Tevrizian. Guilford was confirmed by the United States Senate on June 22, 2006, and received his commission on June 26, 2006.
____

CORRESPONDENCE IN RE: large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts:
____
1) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011, Joseph Zernik wrote:

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 Joseph Zernik wrote:

Needless to say, my communications were intended as a notice to reliably inform you of “unprofessional conduct” in the US courts, hoping that you would initiate corrective actions and report to the authorities, pursuant to the Code of Conduct of US Judges.

2) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011, Joseph Zernik wrote:

From: Joseph Zernik
Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2011
Subject: Re: Additional evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts
To: Judge Andrew J. Guilford

“Ex parte communications”?

With all due respect, I believe that you are misconstruing the law. I have no case before any court, [and the communications below do not pertain to a specific case now before your court that I know of- jz] therefore I am not a “party” and cannot take part in “ex parte communications”.

Of note, a number of the links below are of cases from the US District Court, Central District of California, opined as fraud on the court, enabled through the electronic record systems of the US courts, PACER and CM/ECF.

Still looking forward to reading your opinion on the facts below, detailing large-scale fraud in PACER and CM/ECF.

3) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 Andrew J. Guilford wrote:
From: Judge Andrew J. Guilford
Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM
To: 1st Amendment 1stAmendmentLA@gmail.com

This email address is only for proposed orders on motions pending before
the court. Please cease and desist with ex parte communications.

4) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011, Joseph Zernik wrote:
From: Joseph Zernik
Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: Additional evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts
To: Judge Andrew J. Guilford

I believe that the below is your opinion on the emailing in itself.

I would be grateful for your opinion on the facts detailed in the email message below as well.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)

5) On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 Andrew J. Guilford wrote:
this is totally inappropriate to be sending to the court. Stop
immediately.

6) On Wed, Jun 21, 2011 Joseph Zernik wrote:



From: 1st Amendment
To: jz12345@earthlink.com
Date: 06/21/2011 06:17 PM
Subject: Additional evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic
record systems of the US courts
FOR TEXT OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO JUDGE GUILFORD, PLEASE SEE:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=339_1308706440