Sunday, July 17, 2011
More Victims of Experiments Go to Bioethics Panel
Keith Johnson is an independent journalist and the editor of “Revolt of the
Plebs,” an alternative news website that can be found at RevoltofthePlebs.com.
By Frank Whalen
On May 18-19 in New York City, the President’s
Commission on Bioethics convened
once again. Hundreds of people registered to
speak about their firsthand experiences as
unwilling test subjects of ongoing government experiments.
However, only 20 were selected to speak; they
were each given a paltry 90 seconds to summarize stories
that covered a lifetime of abuse.
AFP previously reported on targeted individuals
speaking before the Bioethics Commission at its
Washington, D.C. meeting in March, and this latest
forum resulted in more obstructionism.
This reporter spoke with several individuals present
in NYE. They mentioned supposed emails sent to people
granting them time to speak, only to discover they
had never been sent. Others weren’t permitted to speak,
only to learn later that they could have spoken. One eyewitness
described the disorganization as “a deliberate
effort to confuse the participants in an attempt to quash
Aside from AFP, media outlets consider this stuff
untouchable. Participants recounted how, at the most
recent NYE hearing, “The room was dismissed for a
break and then we were called back to speak. With the
exception of two [reporters], the rest did not return.”
Many details were given from those who have been
repeatedly victimized. Some people spoke about gang
stalking where strangers speak to individuals about personal
matters that they should not know about. Such
occurrences could be coincidental, but as they happen
several times a day, even while traveling across state
lines, it suggests that surveillance is being used.
When AFP asked about the purpose of this harassment,
it was suggested that the perpetrators want to
breed paranoia and fear in their victims. Others mentioned
a connection to InfraGuard.
According to its website, InfraGuard is “an association
of businesses, academic institutions, state and local
law enforcement agencies and other participants dedicated
to sharing information and intelligence to prevent
hostile acts against the United States.” Utilizing citizen
spies and corporate partners in the private sector would
certainly lead to comprehensive scrutiny on anyone.
It’s clear that allowing a subject to know how thoroughly
they were being watched would make them suspicious
of anyone with whom they came into contact.
This tactic seems useful, since the targeted individual can
then be easily dismissed asmentally unsound, preventing
them from obtaining legal protection or subjecting them
to incarceration and forced medical procedures.
It’s easy to see how these psychological operations
are useful to the elite. As technologies are tested and
results gathered, the stealthy evolution of governmentsanctioned
mind control programs like MK-ULTRA
could be used, amazing though this may sound, to create
thousands of “Manchurian candidate” automatons that
become the domestic terrorists officials are always
warning us about.
During AFP’s conference call, one woman identified
as Leslie claims she discovered devices implanted in her
body with no recollection of the surgery. She mentioned
presenting visual proof to the commission.
The President’s Commission on Bioethics acknowledges,
and even seems remorseful about, experiments
perpetrated against American citizens.
Unfortunately, the media and elected representatives
are unwilling to admit that these supposedly dissolved
programs evidently still exist, and that they’re still harming