(Referringto the Utah "judge" caught "practicing law without alicense", now a nominee for federal judicial office)
What's strangeabout this case is that...there is no such thing as a "license"to practice law. They are "admitted" into practice. Whoissues them a license? The BAR? Please see information below.
AIN'T NO SUCH THING!!!
I. AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREMECOURT;
A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by anystate/State Schware v. Board
of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
B.The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!
Sims v.Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
II. The "CERTIFICATE"from the State Supreme Court:
1. ONLY authorizes,
A. Topractice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATEJUDICIAL
BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.
B. Can ONLY represent WARDS OFTHE COURT.
3. PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND SEE CORPUSJURIS SECUNDUM,
VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.
4. A. "CERTIFICATE"IS NOT A LICENSE....
A. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION.
B.Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!
III. The "STATE BAR"CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!!
A. It is a "UNION DUES CARD"
B.The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION."
1.Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.
2. No otherassociation, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE
ISSUEDBY THE STATE.
C. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.
1.See Attorney General Dan Morales' letter.
2. As per this letter;the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued byhis
IV. The State Bar is;
A. An UnconstitutionalMonopoly, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights.
B. AILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;
C. Violates Article 2, Section1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.
D. There is NOPOWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or
Executiveas the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing. ALL MEMBERS
OFBOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS!
E. In violation of the RIGHT TOWORK LAWS of Texas.
V. State Bar Rules. . . at Article III,Section 2. . .
Enrollment in the State Bar: "Each person whobecomes licensed to practice law is
REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THESTATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR
"AFTER"RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW.
ENROLLMENT IN THE BAR ANDLICENSE ARE NOT THE SAME. THE
BAR CAN NOT LICENSE ANYONE!!!!!
Itis quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has beenperpetrated on the
people of Texas and America. The American Baris an offshoot from London Lawyers'
Guild and was established bypeople with treasonous goals in mind. They have
accomplished 98%of their goals. The NEW WORLD ORDER is in the saddle NOW.
AmericanPeople start the job for them...or before their "NEW WORLDORDER" bosses,
the International Bankers, gain the remaining2%. Texas and American Lawyers should
check historical records.They will find that the first people "ELIMINATED" in apower
shift (no matter who whines) are the lawyers andjudges...for they always have proven
themselves unworthy of anytrust from either side!
"Woe unto you (A woe is a curse)Lawyers! For you have taken away the key of
knowledge; you enterednot in yourselves, and them that were entering in youhindered..."
VI. The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATIONTRAITORS IN OUR MIDST:
The founding Fathers who wrote ourConstitution and formed our government,
made it very clear thatthis was to be a FREE ENTERPRISE country and all Citizens are
tobe equal under Law and not a private capitalistic monopoly or cartelas they had
experienced in Europe.
Under free enterprisesystem, any Citizen who was willing to risk his time and
finances,can go into business. The public with the freedom of choice, canpatronize this
business or decide they don't like the service orproduct and stay away; whereas, in a
private or a capitalisticsystem, only the privileged elite can go into certain businessesor
professions such as had been practiced in Europe for ages,making the public their
The EUROPEAN BANKERSand FINANCIAL CARTELS decided to change
AMERICA to the same systemthat they had so they could take over this government too,
andsent some British lawyers over here to organize an American BarAssociation on the
same order as the English Bar where only Lordscan be Judges and determine who shall
In 1909they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois andhad
the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers)pass an unconstitutional
law that only members of this powerfulunion of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice
law and hold allthe key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. Atthat
time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practicalpurposes, they seceded from the
United States of America.
VII.The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states andexplained
to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secureit would be for them, as
lawyers, to join this union and beprotected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the
lawyers ineach state a charter from the Illinois organization. Californiajoined in 1927 and
a few reluctant states and their lawyers waiteduntil the 1930's to join when the treasonous
act became DE FACTOand the Citizen's became captives. Under this system, thelawyers
could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privilegedclass against the lower class. This
was all made possible by theAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and
have unlawfullysubstituted them in place of Constitutional Laws.
What is the realdifference between the dreaded "Klansman" in white robesand fiery
crosses and the ABA "Klansmen" in the BLACKROBES sitting on the bench? Aren't
they as dictatorial as the KGBand the GESTAPO are accused of being? This has fulfilled
Orwell'sprediction for 1984 and made it a fact, THE BLACK ROBE CULT.
Variousgroups that have been lawfully stoned walled by the ABA and thecourts
suggest we join hands and file an initiative to abolish theBar Association as there are 17
states where Citizens have theRight to do this by the voting process. If we can do this it
willdestroy, the power of the Bar in America with similar method theyused to gain their
power, state by state. Any Citizens who live inone of these 17 states, can do this, and if
not in one of thesestates you can contribute to other states that can.
Who is goingto run the Courts and practice law if we outlaw the BAR?The
CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and COMMON LAWnon-Union
COUNSELORS. I would like to remind you that theConstitution was written in plain
English and the Statutes passedby Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of
Congresshow each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges asthe
Any normal person can read the Constitution andStatutes and understand them
without any trouble. The public inCalifornia was shocked to learn that the State
Government has nocontrol or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members.The
state does not accredit the law schools or hold Barexaminations.
They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The BarAssociation accredits all
the law schools, holds their privateexaminations and selects the students they will accept
in theirorganization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees forthemselves.
The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar aLawyer. They also select the
lawyers that they consider qualifiedfor Judgeships and various other offices in the State.
Only theBar Association or their designated committees can remove any ofthese
lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will notchange this system as they are
also a designated committee of theBar.
On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of theCalifornia State Supreme Court,
another of the Bar AssociationsJudicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should
determinethe legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on theballot. This
is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions,as well as the Laws of this Nation
instituted By and For thePeople as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The
People,not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers.
This is a tremendousamount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated
andheadquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California orany other state.
The only recourse is through this initiativeprocess and vote by the people. After the
Founding Fathers hadformed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the wayour
government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence,"This proves that plain
people, if given the chance, canenact laws and run a government as well as or better than
royaltyand the blue bloods of Europe."
The American people must stopthinking that lawyers are better than they are and can
do a betterjob than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Lawand
the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyoneto have the power or the
right to form a Corporation.
Corporationsare given birth because of ignorance on the part of theAmerican
people and are operating under implied consent and powerwhich they have usurped and
otherwise stolen from the people. ByRIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER,
AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, andmust be put out of business by the good Citizens
of America intheir fight for FREEDOM.
We cannot hope to reclaim our Country ifwe continue to let that beast stay in our
bed and in our homes. Itis imperative that we remove this demon from its throne and put
OURCONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and JUSTICE SYSTEM, back
intoeffect. We must stop worrying about what someone else will think,this is our
country and we have foreign entities attempting totake control of us and our Nation.
These children of Satan havenothing good in store for any of us, and those who are
ignorantenough to believe their lies, deceit, and conspiracy, deserve justwhat they receive
because they ask for it.
IX. MOST LAWYERSare OUR ENEMY:
The small handful that are good must get on theright side and help us win our war,
or they are not on our side.There can be no more sitting on the fence, people must decide
whichside they are on and fight.
Lawyers that claim to be on our sideand are later found out to be traitors, must be
put to death asthis is just what they have planned for all Americans, who do notabide by
their rules and regulations. Americans cannot win the warif they allow traitors to
infiltrate our tanks and get away withit. The enemy Americans are fighting is a deadly
enemy, that carenothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your backon
them, you could be their next victim.
LAWYER AND LAWYER-JUDGE COURTS AREUNCONSTITUTIONAL:
Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world arecommitted in the courtrooms by
lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINSTthe people, as the lawyers and their bar
associations, which areaffiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in
theINTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED
STATESOF AMERICA to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM
They have already taken over the courts and thegovernment, and ALL political
parties, where they all take ordersfrom ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the
internationallyaffiliated bar associations, make a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," theBAR
This necessitated and URGENT need toform a 2nd political party, the ANTI
LAWYER PARTY, where alllawyers and those who attended law school are barred from
this 2ndparty (ALP).. All the states have unconstitutional aristocraticcourts, as their
constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyersystems" require judges to be lawyers,
creating a RULINGCLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Article IV, Section 4, of theU.S.
Constitution, the 13th Amendment and Article I, Section 26 ofthe Texas Constitution.
XI. The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEESto every state in this union a REPUBLICAN
FORM of government. Anyother form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public
officer or branchof government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, orthe
states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, thelawyers have made
themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many publicoffices and branches of government are
open to lawyers only.
Allother people are limited to only two branches of government and toonly certain
offices in those two branches of government, makingall people who are non-lawyers into
2nd class subjectcitizens.
When the courts belong to the people, as the UnitedStates Constitution
REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we thepeople, will NEVER rule against themselves.
In theseUnconstitutional courts foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men"in black
dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY.(Article 1, Section 9 and 10)
with a lot of hanky panky and hocuspocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology, where the
people areterrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers andlawyer
judges in the courtrooms.
The legislative branch ofgovernment does NOT have the Constitutional Power to
issue CourtOrders or any other kind of Orders.
ONLY presidents and governorshave the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS,
but lawyers andlawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with"immunity
Citizens are notpermitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class)is
told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms;that he is not trained in the
law; that he does not know courtrules and procedures; etc.
This is Unconstitutional "lawyersystem," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES
(lawyers) NOT under oath,have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn
testimony andevidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill ofAttainder, NOT
permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1,Sections 9 and 10).
The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone theright to a lawyer or the right to
counsel, or the right to anyother HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is
very SPECIFIC, thatthe accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel
andthis ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES
XII. LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES:
CreatedUnconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions"and "Hearings" to
have eternal EXTORTIONISTIClitigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation
of theU.S. Constitution, and Article 1, Section 14 of the TexasConstitution as this places
defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY ahundred times over. Defendants only have a right
to A TRIAL, NOTTRIALS.
When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREEDBECAUSE OF A
FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freedif found innocent BY A JURY
NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY."
Whenevera lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigantor assisting
in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFYTHEMSELVES, AS
THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and alsothere would be a
violation of the conflict of interest laws, alongwith the violation of separation of powers
and checks andbalances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH
SIDESOF THE BENCH.
These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approvingLAWYER FEES,
directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OFDOLLARS annually, all in violation
of conflict of interestlaws.
Since crime and treason are against the law, and the lawyerprofession is a crooked
profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should beplaced on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all
those who are aiding andabetting these TRAITORS, the lawyers.
As long as there arelawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice.There
will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS(TRAITORS).
IXV. CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL:
AsCASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCHOF
When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or givesorders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is
TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. Healso tampers with testimony when he orders the
answers to beeither "yes" or "No." The lawyer --judge alsotampers, fixes, and rigs the
trial when he orders anythingstricken from the record, or when he "rules" certainevidence
and the truth to be inadmissable. This makes the trialand transcript FIXED and
RIGGED, because the jury does not hearthe REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS.
Juries are made into puppets bythe lawyers and lawyer-judges.
All lawyers are automatically inthe judicial branch of government, as they have the
UnconstitutionalTITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer ofthe
Citizens have to be elected or hired to be inany branch of government but
non-lawyer Citizens are limited toonly 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers as 1st
classcitizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches ofgovernment.
Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in theJudicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2
branches ofgovernment AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected tothe
executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of theseparation of powers, checks
and balances, and the conflict ofinterest laws.
District attorneys and State's attorneys have takenover the Grand Juries FROM the
people, where the people are DENIEDACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to
present evidenceof crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyersand
lawyer-judges. TRY TAKING THIS MATERIAL TO THE GRANDJURIES!
The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law,is not and CANNOT
be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it wouldbe a worthless piece of paper and we would
have millions ofinterpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few wehave
now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TOSUPPORT the U.S.
Constitution, NOT interpret it.
Imaginehypothetically how stupid it would be if any constitution stated,"that the
judicial branch of government has the power tointerpret this constitution."
ORGANIZED CRIME never existeduntil the BAR ASSOCIATION took over OUR
COURTS and OUR GOVERNMENT.Now crime is organized internationally, just as the
BarAssociations are organized. Some of their international affiliationsinclude but are not
limited to THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIALASSOCIATION; INTERNATIONAL
TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; WORLD PEACETHROUGH LAW CENTER;
WORLD ASSEMBLY OF JUDGES: et al. This meansthat the Bar Associations are not
only the INTERNATIONAL CRIMESYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL
WORLD GOVERNMENT andINTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY.
XV. Under INTERNATIONALORDERS:
ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50years ago, are
EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the samemotions and follow the same
procedures in using the sameUnconstitutional "lawyer system" of hanky panky andhocus
pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROMWITHIN by
always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE. ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYERJUDGES
ARE GUILTY OF "TREASON."
In probate, thelawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate. Whenthere
are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint alawyer (a child molesting Fagin)
for EACH CHILD and, at times, thelawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate.
An OUTRAGEOUSamount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN
BYLAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards andother
local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into thepockets of lawyers, as ALL of
these agencies are "TRICKED"and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC
Inall elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS, never vote for a lawyer.Vote
FOR NON-LAWYERS ONLY. If only lawyers are running forelection to the same
office, do NOT vote for any of them, as mostare ALL ALIKE. All lawyers are
programmed to be "TRAITORS ANDINHUMAN CLONES."
WALK SOFTLY AMERICANS AND CARRY A BIGSTICK
Most importantly don't be afraid to use it. We are undervicious assault and we must
make use of every resource we have, orgive into their slavery. COPY AND SPREAD
WIDELY, SEND COPIES TOTHE CRIMINAL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES.
II Corinthians 5:5.For we walk by faith, not by sight.
Fromthe July 1998 IdahoObserver:
DoIdaho Attorneys Have a License to Practice?
"Think ofit as a state being"
by Hari Heath
Does membershipin the American Automobile Association give ordinary Americansa
valid license to drive? Would membership in the National RifleAssociation permit one to
carry a concealed weapon? By joining theNorth American Hunting Club would a person
be licensed to hunt inNorth America? If answer to the previous questions are no, then
whyis membership to a state bar association construed as a "license"for attorneys to
Alfred Adask published an article in the AntiShysterMagazine a while back entitled
"Deemed to be Licensed."It was a humorous expose' on the fact that Attorneys in Texas
don'tactually have a physical license to practice law but are somehow"deemed" to be
licensed by reason of their membership inthe State Bar Association.
I found this to be a curioussituation and thought I would conduct an informal
investigation ofIdaho's "license to practice law." It is, after all,against the law, to practice
law without a license in Idaho.Surely our Idaho Attorney's wouldn't knowingly break the
Iran into some attorneys that I knew, and during the course of ourconversations, I asked
if I could see their license to practicelaw. One continued to talk about hunting and fishing
and avoidedthe subject. The other mumbled something about he was once issueda
certificate years ago, but neither could show an actuallicense.
As Mr. Adask pointed out in his article, thisnon-issued "license" which all judges and
attorneys are"deemed" to have, furthers the independent, non-accountablegrip the private
bar associations have on the judicial branch ofgovernment. Our Idaho Constitution
doesn't require any "licenseto practice law."
Some time passed since my originalinformal investigation on the Idaho "license to
practicelaw." As a defendant who was actively litigating my right totravel without a
drivers "license," so long as I didn'tinjure others, or damage their property, I thought this
could be aprime opportunity to see if the prosecutor and magistrate prosecutingme were
The IdahoState Bar ignored my first letter seeking a copy of the ProsecutorPayne's and
Magistrate McGee's "license to practice law,"so I issued a Subpoena Duces Tecum
demanding either a copy oftheir licenses or a letter on their letterhead stating that theydid
not have a license to practice law.
The Idaho State Barresponded by sending a letter on its letterhead stating:
"TheIdaho State Bar does not have physical "licenses to practicelaw" for our members,
so I am unable to provide you withcopies. However, I can give you the following
DouglasPaul Payne is an active member in good standing of the Idaho StateBar. He is
currently licensed to practice law in Idaho.
DanielJ. McGee is also a member in good standing of the Idaho State Bar. Heis currently
a judge in the state and, therefore, does notpractice law.
Sincerely, Annette Strauser, MembershipAdministrator."
Motion to dismiss
I thenincorporated this in a Motion to Dismiss and filed it with the court(Benewah
county case number CR 97-00407). Excerpting from myAffidavit in Support of Motion to
No license toparactice law
Both Prosecutor Douglas Paul Payne andMagistrate Daniel J. McGee do not have
"licenses to practicelaw," as required by statute to hold and conduct the publicoffices
which each officer has assumed. This fact is furtherevidenced in Exhibit B, a true and
correct copy of a letter fromAnnette Strauser, Membership Administrator for the Idaho
StateBar, attached hereto.
Idaho Code 31-2601 requires that theProsecuting Attorney be "... an attorney and
counselor at lawduly licensed to practice as such in the district courts of thisstate..."
Idaho Code 1-2206 (2) requires that AttorneyMagistrates be "...currently licensed to
practice law in thestate of Idaho."
As evidenced in the letter from AnnetteStrauser (Exhibit B), Prosecutor Payne and
Magistrate McGee do nothave "licenses to practice law." Further in the letter,Ms.
Strauser claims that Douglas Paul Payne "is currentlylicensed to practice law in Idaho."
To follow up thisletter and clarify its contradictory statements, which first statesthat
there are no "licenses to practice law" and thenstates that Douglas Paul Payne "is
currently licensed topractice law in Idaho." I called the Idaho Supreme Court andAnnette
Strauser, on the morning of April 22, 1998.
In myphone call to the Idaho Supreme Court I was informed, by the severalclerks that I
talked to, that when a new attorney passes the barexam and is sworn in at the Supreme
Court, then the Supreme Courtissues a Certificate of Admission.
I then called AnnetteStrauser to confirm this process and to try get a better explanationas
to how an attorney can be "licensed to practice law"when there are no "licenses to
practice law." Strauserconfirmed that the process described by the Supreme Court clerks
toadmit a new attorney to the bar was correct.
Strauser furtherexplained that the "license" for an attorney was differentthan, for
example, a hunting or fishing license, which was anactual paper license. Strauser told me
to think of an attorney'slicense "as a state of being."
Strauser also statedthat to become a member of the bar and maintain status as a member
ingood standing, an attorney must pay membership fees, provideinformation about any
trust accounts they may have, andoccasionally participate in continuing legaleducation
I have also learned from priorphone conversations with the Idaho State Bar, that the bar
is aprivate association, not a governmental entity or office.
>Fromthe evidence and information that I have been able to gather thusfar, an attorneys'
"license to practice law" is not anykind of bona fide "license," but rather a certificateof
membership in a private non- governmental association, whichmakes some attempt at self
regulating its members. At best, it maybe an "implied license," and best was described by
IdahoState Bar Membership Administrator Strauser "as a state ofbeing."
The above mentioned code sections require aprosecutor to be "duly licensed" and
attorneymagistrates to be "currently licensed to practice law."
Black'sLaw, Sixth Edition, offers the following relevant definitions oflicense:
"A permit, granted by an appropriategovernmental body, generally for a consideration, to
a person,firm, or corporation to pursue some occupation or to carry on somebusiness
subject to regulation under the policepower."
"Certificate or the document itself whichgives permission."
"The permission by competentauthority to do an act which, without such permission,
would beillegal, a trespass, a tort, or otherwise not allowable."
Impliedlicense: "One which is presumed to have been given from the actsof the party
authorized to give it."
Black's Law,Sixth Edition offers the following relevant definitions of Duly:
"Indue or proper form or manner; according to legal requirements.Regularly; properly;
suitable; upon a proper foundation, asdistinguished from mere form; according to law in
both form andsubstance."
Idaho Code 9-101, states that "Courtstake judicial notice of...[t]he true signification of all
Englishwords and phrases, and of legal expressions."
The ACCUSEDcontends that as offices of public trust, the Prosecutor which mustbe
"duly licensed" and the attorney magistrate who is tobe "currently licensed" as required in
the Idaho Codesections, must have a bona fide license, not an "impliedlicense" which, as
has been shown herein, is nothing morethan a certificate of membership in a private
association, whichthe Membership Administrator of said association has told me tothink
of an Attorney's license "as a state of being."
Suchmetaphysical "licenses" or memberships certainly do notconform with "the true
signification of the English word""license," are not "according to law in both formand
substance"; "in due or proper form or manner";and are not "A permit, granted by an
Further, most "licenses" are issued byan executive office of government, such as a
sheriff's office, oran administrative agency, such as the Department of Fish andGame.
The Idaho State Bar is a private, non- governmentalassociation, which deems its
memberships to be licenses, andthrough this metaphysical construction has created a
monopolisticcontrol over the judicial branch of public government.
If sucha membership in an association is sufficient "license" tohold an office of public
trust, then similar memberships shouldsuffice for other areas of "licensed" activity.
Is amembership in the American Automobile Association a valid license todrive?
Would membership in the National Rifle Associationpermit one to carry a concealed
By joining theNorth American Hunting Club would a person be licensed to hunt inNorth
If a group of individuals wished permissionto do "an act which, without such permission,
would beillegal, a trespass, a tort, or otherwise not allowable," couldthey then form an
association, issue memberships, deem themselves"licensed," and grant permission to the
associationsmembers to do an act which was otherwise not allowable?
Thecharges in the instant case against the ACCUSED should be dismissedbecause the
prosecutor is not "duly licensed" topractice law, and the magistrate is not "currently
licensedto practice law," therefore both are not in compliance with thestatutory
requirements of their respective offices.
And what result can one expect when one presents aMotion to Dismiss like this one to
the local magistrate court?Magistrate McGee refused at two different hearings to allow
thismotion to be argued. At the first hearing, while not allowing me tomake any
argument on the motion, Magistrate McGee made aprosecutorial argument from the
bench against the merits of themotion.
And what argument could he have made against thismotion, you might ask? The kind that
has been all too common inthe continuing saga of my right to travel case: Sheer
avoidance ofthe facts and the law.
Make money, help your country andsupport The Idaho Observer at the same time by
signing up as aNORFED RedemptionCenter.
P.O. Box 457
Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869