ABOUT IRS FORM 56

http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Withholding/Form56/AboutIRSForm56.htm

Case # 11-cj-002868 and case # 11-cf-1107706 and every single court across this country is a co conspirator to this sinister crime of perpetuity. How so one might ask? Federal judges are signing standing orders to invest all the court cases through the Court Registry Investment System, directly deposited into the Federal Reserve Bank located in Dallas/Houston, Texas.
Every court case is assigned, by the court administrator, a US Treasury Public Debt number, placed onto the court document, including but not limited to traffic citations, after the unknowing participants in the case have received their copy of the same, but without the added monetary transformation of that instrument into a financial transaction, which is the definition of a securitization.
After the Public Debt number is obtained, which now converts the instrument into a counterfeit obligation pursuant to USC TITLE 18 § 472 et seq.473 ;474, now the court administrator additionally counterfeits the same obligation by adding a CUSIP© number.
CUSIP© is the acronym for Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures. It is a copyrighted registered trademark of The American Bankers Association. This means only one of two things. Firstly being the court administrators are knowingly committing copyright infringement violations in addition to uttering counterfeit obligations, and/or secondly that the court administrator must obviously be a member of the CUSIP©.
Now the courts have fraudulently converted every court case into a banking financial securities instrument, fraudulently converting the court into the creditor position and the respondent/plaintiff in the matter now unknowingly converted into the debtor. To make matters even worse for the judges, they are knowingly acting with a vested interest with insider knowledge as insider trading in addition to violations of judicial canons.
Further still, judges are to act without bias, to make rulings on the merit of argument, but instead are making financial investments on every case, knowing the exact meaning of every number and/letter applied to and now written on the face of the instrument in all cases in the form of the CUSIP© and are now ruling based on futures rather than rule of law, evidence, oral or written argument.
Additionally, the courts are also committing tax fraud by shifting the debt created by every particular case back onto the individual who is the actual Creditor, then fraudulently conveying the caseinto an investment instrument to be deposited into the Dallas Houston Texas Federal Reserve which now shifts money from the Creditor side of the transaction into the pockets of the Debtors side, deceptively laundered now as a fraudulent debt into Corporate assets, converted again into bonds, stocks, and grants given back to the county deceptively through the Department of Transportation, or some other agency, now squeaky clean after the laundry process. (Please refer to “Debenture,” “Convertible Debenture” and all the other definitions listed above.)

The U.S., United States, as defined in 28 USC 3002(15), is bankrupt on the authority of Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330-381; 79L. Ed. 9121, and is an "obligor/grantor" to the Federal Reserve Bank, created by the authority of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, 38 Stat. 265, Chapter 6.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, mentioned above, was an act of Private Law, not Public Law, nor Public Policy, as in reference to a Mr. Lewis which was injured by a Federal Reserve vehicle and sued the U.S. government for damages. The court ruled, "...that since the Federal Reserve System and its twelve branch banks are private corporations, the federal government could not be held responsible." Lewis v. U.S., 608F 2d 1239 (1982)
“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators, 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States (1795) [Emphasis added.]

“All codes [Chapter 83, Part II as alleged], rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process.” Rodriques v Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor), 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348 (1985). [Emphasis added.]
Any false representation of material facts made with knowledge of falsity and with intent that it shall be acted on by another in entering into contract, and which is so acted upon, constitutes “fraud,” and entitles party deceived to avoid contracts or recover damages.” Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Birnamwood Oil Co., 92 F.2d 817. “The terms ‘lawful money’ and ‘lawful money of the United States’ shall be construed to mean gold or silver coin of the United States.” 12 USC 152 Also, Boric v. Trott, Pa. 5 Phila. 366, 404; Klauber v. Biggerstaff, 47 Wis. 551 (1879); Lawry v. McGhee, 16 Tenn. 242 (1835) “Money” does not include treasury notes.” Foquet v. Headley, 3 Conn. 534, 536
“Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars.” U.S. Treasury, General Counsel, Munk. “Both notes and checks are acknowledgments of in debt edness [not Credit] and promise of payment.” Hegeman v. Moon, 131 N.Y. 462, 30 N.E. 487 Smith v. Treuhart, et al., 223 N.Y.S. 481
"As the use of private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve notes], debt currency or securities [checks] is concerned, removes the sovereignty status of the government of "We the People" and reduces it to an entity rather than a government in the area of finance and commerce as a corporation or person. . . . Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen. This entity cannot compel performance upon its corporate statute or rules unless it, like any other corporation or person is the holder-in-due course of some contract or commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom the payment and performance are made and are willing to produce said documents and place the same evidence before trying to enforce its demands called statutes. For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 US. 363-371
"When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation" U.S. v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242 See: U.S.C.A.286e, Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6L, Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; 22 U.S.C.A. 286 et seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103. “Under a statute defining a negotiable note as a note made by one person whereby he promises to pay money to another person, and providing that the word 'person' should be construed to extend to every corporation capable by law of making contracts, it was held that the word included a state.” State of Indiana v. Woram, 6 Hill (N.Y.) 33, 38, 40 Am.Dec. 378 A state is a person within the meaning of a statute punishing the false making or fraudulent alteration of a public record with intent that any person may be defrauded. Martin v. State, 24 Tex. 61, 68
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 [Emphasis added.] “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958) [Emphasis added.]